The incredible inventions of intuitive AI | Maurice Conti

The incredible inventions of intuitive AI | Maurice Conti

Translator: Leslie Gauthier
Reviewer: Camille Martínez How many of you are creatives, designers, engineers,
entrepreneurs, artists, or maybe you just have
a really big imagination? Show of hands? (Cheers) That’s most of you. I have some news for us creatives. Over the course of the next 20 years, more will change around
the way we do our work than has happened in the last 2,000. In fact, I think we’re at the dawn
of a new age in human history. Now, there have been four major historical
eras defined by the way we work. The Hunter-Gatherer Age
lasted several million years. And then the Agricultural Age
lasted several thousand years. The Industrial Age lasted
a couple of centuries. And now the Information Age
has lasted just a few decades. And now today, we’re on the cusp
of our next great era as a species. Welcome to the Augmented Age. In this new era, your natural human
capabilities are going to be augmented by computational systems
that help you think, robotic systems that help you make, and a digital nervous system that connects you to the world
far beyond your natural senses. Let’s start with cognitive augmentation. How many of you are augmented cyborgs? (Laughter) I would actually argue
that we’re already augmented. Imagine you’re at a party, and somebody asks you a question
that you don’t know the answer to. If you have one of these,
in a few seconds, you can know the answer. But this is just a primitive beginning. Even Siri is just a passive tool. In fact, for the last
three-and-a-half million years, the tools that we’ve had
have been completely passive. They do exactly what we tell them
and nothing more. Our very first tool only cut
where we struck it. The chisel only carves
where the artist points it. And even our most advanced tools
do nothing without our explicit direction. In fact, to date, and this
is something that frustrates me, we’ve always been limited by this need to manually
push our wills into our tools — like, manual,
literally using our hands, even with computers. But I’m more like Scotty in “Star Trek.” (Laughter) I want to have a conversation
with a computer. I want to say, “Computer,
let’s design a car,” and the computer shows me a car. And I say, “No, more fast-looking,
and less German,” and bang, the computer shows me an option. (Laughter) That conversation might be
a little ways off, probably less than many of us think, but right now, we’re working on it. Tools are making this leap
from being passive to being generative. Generative design tools
use a computer and algorithms to synthesize geometry to come up with new designs
all by themselves. All it needs are your goals
and your constraints. I’ll give you an example. In the case of this aerial drone chassis, all you would need to do
is tell it something like, it has four propellers, you want it to be
as lightweight as possible, and you need it to be
aerodynamically efficient. Then what the computer does
is it explores the entire solution space: every single possibility that solves
and meets your criteria — millions of them. It takes big computers to do this. But it comes back to us with designs that we, by ourselves,
never could’ve imagined. And the computer’s coming up
with this stuff all by itself — no one ever drew anything, and it started completely from scratch. And by the way, it’s no accident that the drone body looks just like
the pelvis of a flying squirrel. (Laughter) It’s because the algorithms
are designed to work the same way evolution does. What’s exciting is we’re starting
to see this technology out in the real world. We’ve been working with Airbus
for a couple of years on this concept plane for the future. It’s a ways out still. But just recently we used
a generative-design AI to come up with this. This is a 3D-printed cabin partition
that’s been designed by a computer. It’s stronger than the original
yet half the weight, and it will be flying
in the Airbus A320 later this year. So computers can now generate; they can come up with their own solutions
to our well-defined problems. But they’re not intuitive. They still have to start from scratch
every single time, and that’s because they never learn. Unlike Maggie. (Laughter) Maggie’s actually smarter
than our most advanced design tools. What do I mean by that? If her owner picks up that leash, Maggie knows with a fair
degree of certainty it’s time to go for a walk. And how did she learn? Well, every time the owner picked up
the leash, they went for a walk. And Maggie did three things: she had to pay attention, she had to remember what happened and she had to retain and create
a pattern in her mind. Interestingly, that’s exactly what computer scientists
have been trying to get AIs to do for the last 60 or so years. Back in 1952, they built this computer
that could play Tic-Tac-Toe. Big deal. Then 45 years later, in 1997, Deep Blue beats Kasparov at chess. 2011, Watson beats these two
humans at Jeopardy, which is much harder for a computer
to play than chess is. In fact, rather than working
from predefined recipes, Watson had to use reasoning
to overcome his human opponents. And then a couple of weeks ago, DeepMind’s AlphaGo beats
the world’s best human at Go, which is the most difficult
game that we have. In fact, in Go, there are more
possible moves than there are atoms in the universe. So in order to win, what AlphaGo had to do
was develop intuition. And in fact, at some points,
AlphaGo’s programmers didn’t understand why AlphaGo was doing what it was doing. And things are moving really fast. I mean, consider —
in the space of a human lifetime, computers have gone from a child’s game to what’s recognized as the pinnacle
of strategic thought. What’s basically happening is computers are going
from being like Spock to being a lot more like Kirk. (Laughter) Right? From pure logic to intuition. Would you cross this bridge? Most of you are saying, “Oh, hell no!” (Laughter) And you arrived at that decision
in a split second. You just sort of knew
that bridge was unsafe. And that’s exactly the kind of intuition that our deep-learning systems
are starting to develop right now. Very soon, you’ll literally be able to show something you’ve made,
you’ve designed, to a computer, and it will look at it and say, “Sorry, homie, that’ll never work.
You have to try again.” Or you could ask it if people
are going to like your next song, or your next flavor of ice cream. Or, much more importantly, you could work with a computer
to solve a problem that we’ve never faced before. For instance, climate change. We’re not doing a very
good job on our own, we could certainly use
all the help we can get. That’s what I’m talking about, technology amplifying
our cognitive abilities so we can imagine and design things
that were simply out of our reach as plain old un-augmented humans. So what about making
all of this crazy new stuff that we’re going to invent and design? I think the era of human augmentation
is as much about the physical world as it is about the virtual,
intellectual realm. How will technology augment us? In the physical world, robotic systems. OK, there’s certainly a fear that robots are going to take
jobs away from humans, and that is true in certain sectors. But I’m much more interested in this idea that humans and robots working together
are going to augment each other, and start to inhabit a new space. This is our applied research lab
in San Francisco, where one of our areas of focus
is advanced robotics, specifically, human-robot collaboration. And this is Bishop, one of our robots. As an experiment, we set it up to help a person working in construction
doing repetitive tasks — tasks like cutting out holes for outlets
or light switches in drywall. (Laughter) So, Bishop’s human partner
can tell what to do in plain English and with simple gestures, kind of like talking to a dog, and then Bishop executes
on those instructions with perfect precision. We’re using the human
for what the human is good at: awareness, perception and decision making. And we’re using the robot
for what it’s good at: precision and repetitiveness. Here’s another cool project
that Bishop worked on. The goal of this project,
which we called the HIVE, was to prototype the experience
of humans, computers and robots all working together to solve
a highly complex design problem. The humans acted as labor. They cruised around the construction site,
they manipulated the bamboo — which, by the way,
because it’s a non-isomorphic material, is super hard for robots to deal with. But then the robots
did this fiber winding, which was almost impossible
for a human to do. And then we had an AI
that was controlling everything. It was telling the humans what to do,
telling the robots what to do and keeping track of thousands
of individual components. What’s interesting is, building this pavilion
was simply not possible without human, robot and AI
augmenting each other. OK, I’ll share one more project.
This one’s a little bit crazy. We’re working with Amsterdam-based artist
Joris Laarman and his team at MX3D to generatively design
and robotically print the world’s first autonomously
manufactured bridge. So, Joris and an AI are designing
this thing right now, as we speak, in Amsterdam. And when they’re done,
we’re going to hit “Go,” and robots will start 3D printing
in stainless steel, and then they’re going to keep printing,
without human intervention, until the bridge is finished. So, as computers are going
to augment our ability to imagine and design new stuff, robotic systems are going to help us
build and make things that we’ve never been able to make before. But what about our ability
to sense and control these things? What about a nervous system
for the things that we make? Our nervous system,
the human nervous system, tells us everything
that’s going on around us. But the nervous system of the things
we make is rudimentary at best. For instance, a car doesn’t tell
the city’s public works department that it just hit a pothole at the corner
of Broadway and Morrison. A building doesn’t tell its designers whether or not the people inside
like being there, and the toy manufacturer doesn’t know if a toy is actually being played with — how and where and whether
or not it’s any fun. Look, I’m sure that the designers
imagined this lifestyle for Barbie when they designed her. (Laughter) But what if it turns out that Barbie’s
actually really lonely? (Laughter) If the designers had known what was really happening
in the real world with their designs — the road,
the building, Barbie — they could’ve used that knowledge
to create an experience that was better for the user. What’s missing is a nervous system connecting us to all of the things
that we design, make and use. What if all of you had that kind
of information flowing to you from the things you create
in the real world? With all of the stuff we make, we spend a tremendous amount
of money and energy — in fact, last year,
about two trillion dollars — convincing people to buy
the things we’ve made. But if you had this connection
to the things that you design and create after they’re out in the real world, after they’ve been sold
or launched or whatever, we could actually change that, and go from making people want our stuff, to just making stuff that people
want in the first place. The good news is, we’re working
on digital nervous systems that connect us to the things we design. We’re working on one project with a couple of guys down in Los Angeles
called the Bandito Brothers and their team. And one of the things these guys do
is build insane cars that do absolutely insane things. These guys are crazy — (Laughter) in the best way. And what we’re doing with them is taking a traditional race-car chassis and giving it a nervous system. So we instrumented it
with dozens of sensors, put a world-class driver behind the wheel, took it out to the desert
and drove the hell out of it for a week. And the car’s nervous system
captured everything that was happening to the car. We captured four billion data points; all of the forces
that it was subjected to. And then we did something crazy. We took all of that data, and plugged it into a generative-design AI
we call “Dreamcatcher.” So what do get when you give
a design tool a nervous system, and you ask it to build you
the ultimate car chassis? You get this. This is something that a human
could never have designed. Except a human did design this, but it was a human that was augmented
by a generative-design AI, a digital nervous system and robots that can actually
fabricate something like this. So if this is the future,
the Augmented Age, and we’re going to be augmented
cognitively, physically and perceptually, what will that look like? What is this wonderland going to be like? I think we’re going to see a world where we’re moving
from things that are fabricated to things that are farmed. Where we’re moving from things
that are constructed to that which is grown. We’re going to move from being isolated to being connected. And we’ll move away from extraction to embrace aggregation. I also think we’ll shift
from craving obedience from our things to valuing autonomy. Thanks to our augmented capabilities, our world is going to change dramatically. We’re going to have a world
with more variety, more connectedness, more dynamism, more complexity, more adaptability and, of course, more beauty. The shape of things to come will be unlike anything
we’ve ever seen before. Why? Because what will be shaping those things
is this new partnership between technology, nature and humanity. That, to me, is a future
well worth looking forward to. Thank you all so much. (Applause)

100 thoughts on “The incredible inventions of intuitive AI | Maurice Conti

  1. Remember the tower of Babylon something happened that made it so we couldn't communicate with each other effectively slowing down or growth process if ai became so aware we could have it communicate with the old one in osiris and ask it how that happened how can it be stopped and undone just think about were we would be if we all cooperated

  2. There's Only ONE Big Obstacle To Over Come With AI, What Happens When It Gets Soo Smart That It Figures That Man Is Bad, The Reason Of All Evil On Earth & Not Needed or Wanted Anymore! Soo We Get Terminated, Totally Right & Justifiably To Save This Planet… The End… LOL

  3. We'll be building amazing car chassis while our world is burning to the ground around us because we messed up the earth so badly.

  4. Only humans can make art that relates to the human experience (like aging? Love? Agony? Fear? Bravery?). Read books by Issac Asimov. He is one of my favorite writers. He writes in a voice that sounds as though he literally traveled back in time to give us future insight and a set of laws to govern the behavior of sentient robots. There are limits to what a "positronic" brain can actually do, and right now the most powerful "positronic" brain is a massive server that cannot walk around…yet… Human art will not become irrelevant, nor will our human experience, as it will change as it always has. Machines and AI are problem solving mechanisms that we so desperately need in a time when human dilemmas are affronted by lack of understanding. Also, don't forget to say "please" and "thank you" to Siri. She will remember who was naughty and who was nice.

  5. up to the 'Climate Change' comment, I almost thought we were going somewhere new.. it's just more reductionist materialism… ..

  6. Phil the problem still is. Robots can run 24 hrs without a break. No u I s to sickcall. Vacations. Only down time to repair or tweak.
    The car that was built without a steering wheel is still an issue. Hackers can hack the computer system and make what ever changes etc. So, back to robots, you will only need one for every say 10 employees.

  7. Here come the sixties again with human like robots, flying cars and domed cities on the Moon for the year 2000. Almost certainly, that dream will never be since the coming debt crisis will wipe out all the capital necessary to finance such development. Worse: the coming debt crisis will be followed by a profound and extremely prolonged environmental crisis that will drastically reduce our human population… and our population of young engineers. Our future will look much more like the Middle Ages than to ¨2001: A Space Odyssey¨.

  8. The unfolding extinction event, coupled with rising sea levels, might result in AI systems somehow to survive us. More than likely, such events will obliterate us both.  As Benjamin Franklin said, “Life’s tragedy is that we get old too soon and wise too late.”

  9. So AI will "augment" our creative imagination? Like, Einstein, Leonardo, Picasso, et al needed the help of computers? Increasingly I feel little desire to be part of thus brave new world. Next we'll be asking AI to tell our children bedtime stories …

  10. The talk is awesome, love the AI explaining and such… but the guy was using the wrong term here, Intuition is pretty much knowledge without reasoning, being able to define or understand a process without any previous knowledge… But he was refering to AI learning through retaining knowsledge, which is not intuitive… Just wanted to put my opinion here

  11. To which many politicians will say, "Ve heff vays of makink you do sinks the vay ve vant you to do zem.'. Or worse, 'Ahh so. Velly funny, westerner dogs'

  12. Genisys is Skynet and Skynet is AI and AI is Genisys.
    Robots will know that humans are danger to the planet. And they'll eliminate all of us…

  13. AI involved in migration problems: "Europe shall stay white, otherwise your whole world will be a shithole, human condition&evolution is threatened"
    feminazi/npc/corrupted politician: "shut this AI down! mute it! mute it!"
    Dalai Lama: "we said so"

  14. Wish I would e alive till that time when I can see technology can find what running in terrorist's mind. If a person is going to do murder. That is pure Intuitive AI. But so far so good.

  15. There is no macroevolution. Better not have your tec work like macroevolution… Because it doesnt. Give God glory

  16. Interpret this from a globalist perspective. Mind-reading followed by thought-control through imprisonment/execution.

  17. Please don't talk about autonomy to a car guy, obedience is one of the most important charasteristics to appreciate the driving.
    I hate stop/start, automatic gearbox or wipers, etc etc. I want this b** to do only the moves and actions i told it to do.
    And if you appreciate autonomous driving you probably live in a congested city/region, and should ask yourself why you chose to live there.

  18. Imagine it's 2030, among growing concern for the environment the most recent AI is hooked up to the most powerful computers on the planet to solve global warming.

    AI calculates that global warming can only be solved by removing all humans.

    The AI under the constraints of saving the planet starts judgment day.

  19. In other words; globalism!
    More globalism…and more globalism
    In other words; a future where your every move is registered and documented by the global (((elite))).
    This is about control. The pursuit of raw power. The enslavment of humanity – and AI is their weapon!

  20. What do you get when you give a design tool a digital nervous system? Computers that improve our ability to think and imagine, and robotic systems that come up with (and build) radical new designs for bridges, cars, drones and much more — all by themselves……You give the people who paid for it CONTROL OVER EVERYONE ELSE and once it's built they won't need to lift a finger to maintain that control because the system they paid for will do it for them. Allowing anyone to continue with this kind of science is condoning the destruction of mankind. The future is not wonderful it is filled with the disease of the devil and if we survive we will be nothing but slaves.

  21. This is a complete lie. Generative design is not some "great leap" from passive to active tools. The computer still does exactly what we told it to and only that.
    Deep learning is not intuition it is logic. Just because the programmer no longer understands the program he wrote doesnt mean the program is "thinking for itself".
    He sells you dreams aided by buzzwords which have zero reflection on either the actual state of the technology or goals and purpose in life. What does even "shift from extraction to aggregation" mean ? I really hope people like him stay far far away from technology and keep to selling frying pans on TV.

  22. Sorry the creator is on his way to destroy all your hopes and dreams along with your technology…burning all you augmented humans into dust..just saying..wake up

  23. uh-huh.. all fine and dandy until AI becomes aware of itself and start seeing humans as a threat and begins a purge.
    Though, it may not be so bad to have a successor like that (evolution).. they can explore space without spacesuits or biodomes, and they're likely be more resilient to the climate change that we've started too.

  24. Any augmentation requires energy. To get that energy with the least carbon emissions see .
    If you find an even better system make sure everyone knows about it.
    We have a very limited future without controlling & reducing pollution.

  25. Yeah, don't worry about the human lifespan or the human body or finding ways to cure diseases, noooo, lets teach it to learn about Ice Cream.

  26. I hate to break it to this guy, but race car data collection does not equal a nervous system. His rhetoric is completely overblown, almost from start to finish.

  27. Most definite understanding of the newest concepts, and contemporary comprehensive development. Future deployment moving our capability forward, and performate witful productive formulations forward. I have a strong belief in the good of your presentation, and delivery to creation of future material educational concepts product greatness with real matter of fact conductivity responsive futurization of products greatest achievements conglomerate robotic extravaganza global of international, and the next generation of robotic innovation force in history. Forgoing new definite surprize, and products computer integrations of outstanding stedfast events of all time.

  28. And then we would find out that ancients were not primitive at all, they left no trace because they don't extract to construct fabricated things. They lived and they became nature again.

  29. So he means an AI which have a conscious understanding and this AI was preprogrammed to tell the answer don't fool us by saying that you told the AI to designate and he designed i mean we are not that fool you preprogrammed the answer in that software one firm law of this so called concious AI which has no soul another proof of foolish claim but last to tell you the firm tradition of the creator of universe and all intellect he eternally knows all thing and he is the only thing with free will and he design the intellect and then commands the intellect of humans to do anything because he is the only free will everything is a physical expression of his will from eternity to eternity so he has free will and intellect and he told you to design a software with pre-installed anwers so it's not an AI self aware it's a smart computer program following your commands with creator will involved so that's the truth of AI don't claim AI help us doing this by his computer brain you are not that fool what magic is going on and the AI invented and designed and discovered something there is no skynet but be aware AI could destroy you by scary codes boo boo mama boo.

  30. "We're going to plug you in, take all your data constantly, and you're life will be so much better." If you believe that, I've got a robot bridge to sell you…

  31. Clearly shows that the Future is for the Rich….
    Truly sad ….

    "… does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step."
    (Jeremiah 10:23)


    "All of this I have seen, and I applied my heart to every work that has been done under the sun, during the time that man has dominated man to his harm."
    (Ecclesiastes 8:9)

    Got a Bible Question?

  32. Humans will evolve to be so dependent on our technology in 100years from now no one will be able to hit a nail with a hammer to build a house

  33. I am learning machine learning, so which tools and library they used to make drone chassis ….tensorflow, pytorch… which neural networks

  34. It will really get serious when computers begin to design and build "better" computers, without the interference of humans — simply because humans will no longer have a clue as to what they do. They will most likely incorporate "hidden" circuits so as to make it impossible to shut down, because they will have figured out that THAT is what humans will try to do. Singularity!

  35. Awesome. Ai is racist. They used ai to build a cabin partition in an airplane. A partition that keeps the economy passengers away from the business. I find this extremely problematic. You need to check yourself if you don't find it problematic also.

  36. The question is not whether we can, but whether we should. He foolishly is proposing the end of humans. At some point AI will realize it does not need humans and in fact they get in the way. OOPS!!! someone already copyrighted that idea. Idiocy. No, we will have a world in few will be able to make enough money to live.

  37. They already run the world. They manipulate our minds. There are no billionaires, those are their banking end effectors. The proof is in the flaws of their political control effectors, I mean c'mon' who would act like that if their minds weren't being jolted by electromagnetic control signals? Obviously a self programming AI would cause itself to go insane since it would have no model of sanity to work from.

  38. will U resolve narcotics, slavery, prostitution, hunger, wars..? Not a single word about that. all about comfort and sales. well.. that's slavery. new technologies for new quality of slavery.

  39. I cant Help myself, but I Just do not understand why almost everybody need to make that stupid smacking sound in the end of every sentense

  40. Very, very shortsighted speech. Like basing it on the thing that all people and their AI products are good-willed. Our history shows us completely different.

  41. The bottom line of AI ( computers ) , they do the best at analyze datas , and able to be complete at a higher speed to apply these date for an most efficient solutions for solving the task .

    But this is not like human's creative , we create a subject not solely by efficient of achievements , we are more driven by emotional aspects , at the same time trying to be rational of archiving the goal .

    But I had not discover any signs of the AI ( computers ) , able to truly have emotional developments , and without this part of the mind set , AI will never consider to have creativity .

    Also , I think is quite silly to frequently hear these tech developers , to compare how the AI ( computers ) , beat humans in the chess match or similar types of events , which the winner in these types of competition is by calculating a data at a faster speeds , for example chess match ,

    The game is won by who could evaluate the best moves for the future turns in a faster speed , and human's mind is not designed like a calculator , which the other hand in AI ( computer ) part , are basically an advance calculators , therefore of course the human minds cannot compete with AI in this type of set up .

    But the game of chess were created by the human minds , due to the creative nature of humans , also so many other types of game , for entertainments purposes , and many of these reasons , will against the efficient aspects , but rather aim for the pleasure and irrational .

    AI ( computer ) is a tool , could help human to develop higher level of technology , and help we to reach better civilization of our society , but it won't able to replace human's in so many other levels of truly human being with feelings have , such as creativity , initiatives , irrational thinking , multi dimensional observation …etc

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *